[Rescued from my old blog.]
Rudbeckia Hirta over at Learning Curves submits a great idea for a new TV blockbuster:
I’ve read that Charlotte Mason used oral exams like this with her students, though of course without the pressure and sarcastic comments. I’d love to hear how this works in “real life.”
Grading is one of the things that puzzles me about Charlotte Mason style oral exams. I don’t give grades to young students, but grades are important in high school. I need to read more, but my current understanding was that Mason’s tests were summary reviews with some problems to work (such as a student might have been set to work on a blackboard) and mostly rather general questions (such as, “Tell me what you know about fractions” or slope or conic sections or whatever). It seems to me the general questions would be very hard to grade. I guess the teacher would have in mind certain points he or she expects the student to mention about the topic. Still, I can see math being easier to grade in this way than a similar history exam: “Tell me what you remember about World History.” My ninth-grade teacher actually used that for a final exam—just that one question, with an hour to write the answer. Aaaargh!
Has anyone tried oral exams, especially in high school math? Please share!
Check out these related posts: Best Bits of Let’s Play Math! Humor