FAQ: Remembering What We Learn

Mother and son working on math homework

“When we do our daily lessons, my son does great. Everything seems to click. But when he sees the same topic later, in a review or on a test, it’s like he’s never heard of it before. How can I help him pull math up from the dregs of lost memory?”

This is a common problem, and there’s no easy answer.

You see, it’s easy for humans to convince ourselves we understand something when someone else explains it. It seems to make sense, but it doesn’t stick in our minds.

If you think of times when you’ve tried to learn something new, you can probably remember the feeling—you thought you had it, but then when you tried to do it yourself, your mind went blank.

So how can we help our kids when they can’t remember what to do?

Explanations Are Easily Forgotten

One thing that can help is to NOT explain the lesson. Just start with a problem, and ask how your son would think about it. What would he try?

For example, if you are working on times-8 strategies, how would he try to figure out 6 × 8? What does he remember that would help him? Where would he start?

Then you can build on his answer.

If he figured it out, then can he think of another way to do it? There is always more than one way to do anything in math. So, if he solved it by counting 8’s, what’s another way? What if he wasn’t allowed to count? Could he figure it out using any math facts he knows?

Talking about how he reasons things through will help it stick in memory.

Posing His Own Problems

Or if he couldn’t figure it out, then let him name a problem he can do.

Perhaps 6 × 8 is beyond him, but he does know 6 × 2. Then work from there. If two 6s are 12, then how much would four 6s be? And if four of them are 24, then how many would double-4 of them be?

And then once he’s got that answer, can he think of another problem that will help to fix it in his mind? Maybe from knowing 6 × 8, can he figure out what 6 × 9 would be?

Or let him pose a problem for you to solve.

Maybe he gives you 16 × 8. How would you think about that? Talk about your reasoning. Perhaps you already know that 8 × 8 = 64, so 16 eights would be twice that much. Or you used some other way of thinking.

Going Deeper

Push the idea of multiplication beyond what the book has in mind.

  • How about fractions? If he knows what 1 × 8 is, can he use that to figure out what 1/2 times 8 would be?
  • Or −1 times 8?
  • Or if he knows what 3 × 8 is, can he use that to figure out 300 × 8? Or something harder, like 33 × 8?

The idea is to start from where he is and push him to think as deeply as he can.

When we ask a student to listen to our explanation and follow our instructions, we are asking them to think our thoughts. But thinking someone else’s thoughts is boring.

What we want is to have kids who think their own thoughts about the topic at hand. Because thinking their own thoughts is fun and leads to more learning.

 
* * *

Find my whole series of FAQ posts here.

Are you looking for more creative ways to play math with your kids? Check out all my books, printable activities, and cool mathy merch at Denise Gaskins’ Playful Math Store. Or join my email newsletter.

This blog is reader-supported. If you’d like to help fund the blog on an on-going basis, then please join me on Patreon for mathy inspiration, tips, and an ever-growing archive of printable activities.

“FAQ: Remembering What We Learn” copyright © 2026 by Denise Gaskins. Image at the top of the post copyright © SeventyFour / Depositphotos.

2 thoughts on “FAQ: Remembering What We Learn

  1. This landed for my daughter last year. We had the same pattern: she would work through 6 x 8 beautifully with me in the kitchen, and two weeks later it was like she had never seen it. Your “NOT explain the lesson” move is exactly what finally broke her out of that loop. Once she was the one saying “well, I know 6 x 4 is 24, so 6 x 8 is 48,” the fact actually belonged to her. The piece we added alongside that was a short daily fluency slot, ten minutes, mixed operations, no new teaching. Our rule was simple: if she couldn’t answer in about three seconds, the fact got flagged and came back more often. Not to replace the reasoning, just to make sure the answer she had derived from strategy didn’t have to be re-derived every single time. She kept doing the “figure it out from what you know” work with me, and the short daily slot let the derived answers calcify into automatic ones. The thinking work and the fluency work live in different parts of the day. What I appreciate about your framing is that it stops the parent from rescuing. That is the hardest part. Thanks for this.

Leave a reply to Denise Gaskins Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.