Mental Math: Three Basic Principles

Doing mental math on the couch

“We know that algorithms are amazing human achievements, but they are not good teaching tools because mimicking step-by-step procedures can actually trap students into using less sophisticated reasoning than the problems are intended to develop.”

— Pam Harris, Math Is Figure-Out-Able Podcast

Whether you work with a math curriculum or take a less-traditional route to learning, do not be satisfied with mere pencil-and-paper competence. Instead, work on building your children’s mental math skills, because mental calculation forces a child to understand arithmetic at a much deeper level than is required by traditional pencil-and-paper methods.

Traditional algorithms (the math most of us learned in school) rely on memorizing and rigidly following the same set of rules for every problem, repeatedly applying the basic, single-digit math facts. Computers excel at this sort of step-by-step procedure, but children struggle with memory lapses and careless errors.

Mental math, on the other hand, relies on a child’s own creative mind to consider how numbers interact with each other in many ways. It teaches students the true 3R’s of math: to Recognize and Reason about the Relationships between numbers.

The techniques that let us work with numbers in our heads reflect the fundamental properties of arithmetic. These principles are also fundamental to algebra, which explains why flexibility and confidence in mental math is one of the best predictors of success in high school math and beyond.

Your textbook may explain these properties in technical terms, but don’t be intimidated by the jargon. These are just common-sense rules for playing with numbers.

Continue reading Mental Math: Three Basic Principles

Monday is Square Root Day

square tree with roots

On May 5, we celebrate one of the rarest math holidays: Square Root Day, 5/5/25.

Here are a few ideas for playing math with squares and roots.

What is a Square Root?

Five is the square root of twenty-five, which means it is the number we can “square” (multiply times itself) to get 25.

The root is the base number from which the square grows. In physical terms, it is the side of the square.

Imagine a straight segment of length 5, perhaps a stick or a piece of chalk. Now lay that segment down and slide it sideways for a distance equal to its length. Drag the stick across sand, or pull the chalk across paper or a slate.

Notice how this sideways motion transforms the one-dimensional length into a two-dimensional shape, a square.

The area of this shape is the square of its root: 5 × 5 = 25.

What do you think would happen if you could drag the square through a third dimension, or drag that resulting shape through a fourth dimension?
How many shapes do you suppose might grow from that original root of 5?

Continue reading Monday is Square Root Day

Math Journal: The 1-2-3 Puzzle

colorful numbers 1, 2, 3

Math Journaling Adventures series by Denise GaskinsThere’s still time to check out my Math Journaling Adventures project and discover how playful writing activities will help your students learn mathematics. Preorder your books today!

Meanwhile, here’s a math puzzle to share with your kids…

Write down any whole number. It can be a single-digit number, or as big as you like. For example:

64,861,287,124,425,928

Now, count up the number of even digits (including zeros), the number of odd digits, and the total number of digits your number contains. Write those counted numbers down in order, like this:

64,861,287,124,425,928
even 12, odd 5, total 17

Continue reading Math Journal: The 1-2-3 Puzzle

If Not Methods: Fraction Multiplication

Father and son doing math homework together

This is the last post (for now, at least) in our If Not Methods series about how to help children figure out tough calculations.

By the time students reach the topic of multiplying fractions, they have become well-practiced at following rules. After some of the complex procedures they’ve learned, a simple rule like “tops times tops, and bottoms times bottoms” comes as a relief.

But we know that relying on rules like that weakens understanding, just as relying on crutches weakens physical muscles.

If we want our students to think, to make sense of math, to figure things out, what can we do with a problem like 5/6 × 21 ?

Continue reading If Not Methods: Fraction Multiplication

If Not Methods: Mixed Numbers

A family doing math homework together

Continuing our series on teaching the tough topics of arithmetic

Our own school math experiences led many of us to think that math is all about memorizing and following specific procedures to get right answers. But that kind of math is obsolete in our modern world.

The math that matters today is our ability to recognize and reason about numbers, shapes, and patterns, and to use the relationships we know to figure out something new.

But what if our children get stumped on a mixed-number calculation like 2 5/12 + 1 3/4?

Continue reading If Not Methods: Mixed Numbers

If Not Methods – Subtracting Fractions

Father and daughter doing math homework

We’re continuing our series of posts on how to build robust thinking skills instead of forcing our children to walk with crutches.

When we say, “Use this method, follow these steps,” we teach kids to be mathematical cripples.

If your student’s reasoning is, “I followed the teacher’s or textbook’s steps and out popped this answer,” then they’re not doing real math. Real mathematical thinking says, “I know this and that are both true, and when I put them together, I can figure out the answer.”

But what if our kids get stumped on a fraction calculation like 7/8 − 1/6?

Continue reading If Not Methods – Subtracting Fractions

If Not Methods: Scary Division

Father and son working on math homework

We’ve been exploring the many ways to help children reason about tough math problems, without giving them rules to follow.

As always, real math is not about the answers but the thinking.

But what about division with scary, big numbers? What if our kids get stumped on a calculation like 3840 ÷ 16?

When kids say, “I don’t know how”

We can teach without crippling children’s understanding if we follow the Notice-Wonder-Create cycle:

  • Notice everything about the problem.
  • Wonder about the possibilities.
  • Create something new: perhaps a solution or a math journal entry, or perhaps just a deeper level of understanding.

“Notice, Wonder, Create” is not a three-step method for solving math problems. It’s the natural, spiraling cycle by which our minds learn anything.

Continue reading If Not Methods: Scary Division

If Not Methods: Multi-Digit Multiplication

Mother helping her daughter with math homework

As we’ve seen in earlier posts, there are more ways to solve any math problem than most people realize. Teaching children to follow memorized steps and procedures actually cripples their understanding of number relationships and patterns.

But what if our children get stumped on a multi-digit multiplication calculation like 36 × 15?

Continue reading If Not Methods: Multi-Digit Multiplication

If Not Methods: Dividing Fractions

Mother and daughter working together on math homewrok

As I said in an earlier post, we don’t want to give our children a method because that acts as a crutch to keep them from making sense of math.

But what if our children get stumped on a tough fraction calculation like 1 1/2 ÷ 3/8?

Continue reading If Not Methods: Dividing Fractions

Musings: If Not Methods, Then What?

Last week, I quoted Pam Harris calling out a foundational myth of math education, the idea that we need to teach kids the methods that work on even the most difficult math problems.

“We have a misconception in math education that we think we need to teach methods so that kids can answer the craziest kind of a particular problem.

    “We would be far better served to teach kids to think about the most common kinds of questions WELL, and let technology handle the crankiest.”

    —Pam Harris

    Since many of us grew up in schools that taught these methods, they may feel like the only sensible approach to math. Without the standard procedures, how will our kids learn to do math?

    If we don’t teach subtraction with borrowing/renaming, how can students figure out calculations like 431 − 86? If we don’t teach fraction rules, how will they handle problems like 1 1/2 ÷ 3/8?

    Continue reading Musings: If Not Methods, Then What?